A Weather forum. Weather Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Weather Banter forum » Weather Related Newsgroups » sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Why Doug & Kelly were irresponsible as they challenged/pressured



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 2nd 09, 02:10 PM posted to sci.geo.meteorology,sci.environment,alt.global-warming,sci.skeptic
leonard78sp@gmail.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 178
Default Why Doug & Kelly were irresponsible as they challenged/pressured

On Jul 2, 9:01Â*am, David wrote:
So, Prof Fred Sanders was my teacher at MIT
in synoptic meteorology.

Further, I am qualifed in climatology in part
because of my exceptional training in statistics
resulting from my assistantship with the late Dr. Throrton
Roby, experimental psychologist of Tufts University.

Also, I work daily in my science.

Also, at the Marriott Health Club where I am a
member, today I urged guests to become active
politically to push the government towards better
meteorology. Â*(My undergraduate degree is in
political science but not only political science...)

I consider the attack on my credentials frivolous
and declare worldwide that my attackers must
never be taken seriously in the least...

So, the matter is closed forever as far as I am
concerned.

BTW I urge Doug & Kelly to shut up for good about it.

David Christainsen


••Â*From what I see in your posts,
you should be the one to SHUT UP!

- -
There are three types of people that you
can_not_talk into behaving well. The
stupid, the religious fanatic, and the evil.

1-The stupid aren't smart enough to
follow the logic of what you say. You
have to tell them what is right in very
simple terms. If they don't agree, then
you'll never be able to change their mind.

2- the religious fanatic

If what you say goes against their
religious belief, they will cling to that
religious belief even if it means their
death."

3- There is no way to reform evil-
Not in a million years

There is no way to convince the terrorists,

anthropogenic global warming alarmists,

serial killers, paedophiles, and predators

to change their evil ways. They knew what
they were doing was wrong, but that
knowledge didn't stop them. It only made
them more careful in how they went about
performing their evil acts.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2012 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.