Ooyarbuggaman!

Large cluster of not all that large quakes just appeared he
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/.../10/295_20.php

977 mb and it's off on it's Norse trek. Two at 987 mb look ready to
take its place.

It will, at least, be interesting to watch them -if not revealing.

The weather has broken here, it seems. Was there a surge over the
Virgin Isles last time? For the same weather?

Odile looks to be increasing.

But this is what has put an hair up my behind:

http://www.gearthblog.com/images/images107/noaa.jpg
and
http://www.cop.noaa.gov/images/eslr/csdl-map.png

I was looking for more relevant sea floor bathymetry for that part of
the North Atlantic and came across them by accident. I had no idea the
sea surface was so complex just there.

My knowledge of the relationship with the sea and the weather is
strictly limited to what I was able to gather from North Wales when I
lived there and from looking at maps of places like San Francisco -
which seemed to me to resemble Orkney.

Which in turn resembled Iceland; which lead me here (eventually.) Well
I am here now. Looks like I have wasted a lot of my time.

I'd pull my finger out if I wasn't afraid of an avalanche.

Norbert is crossing the Mexican Baja peninsula. Something unknown
makes them turn about when they leave the tropics. Or does it?

If so, is it the same impetus that forces more northerly storms ashore
in the same direction? Or is it no force at all, just that the effort
they spend in going west ends when they stop building?

In which case, as they stop building they'd decrease in intensity
would they not?

There does not appear to be anything visible in the bathymetry that
explains the behaviour of storms in this region. Do they actually have
an explanation or are they permitted to defy the laws of god and
physics?

I'll tell you what it is a good job the three body problem is one of:
Sun - Earth - Moon and not:
God - Man - Creation, or there would be a problem.

Fortunately, god has resolved the apparent slight difficulty involved
with:
Weatherlawyer - Internet - Everyfeckerelse.

(I'm good, I am!)

On Oct 11, 4:20*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Oct 11, 1:55*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

A gathering of Lows now fills the NE North Atlantic. The weather in
Britain is exactly as it was at the start of the spell I stated at the
outside, it would be so like. A dull overcast that requires one puts a
light on at mid day if one wishes to make a major repair to an engine,
or whatever, on one's kitchen table.

Dull? Overcast?? Are you sure???

You do know what these little sun symbols on these tables mean, W(ho must be obeyed),
don't you?

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/...ons/index.html

I wonder if you could specify what neotype of androgen you conform to,
for me, please.

It's just that I have atypical homophobic attrition built into my
system and need to conform to whatever parameters I might be able to
reach for your edification.

No offence distended.

On Oct 12, 12:33*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Oct 11, 4:20*pm, Dawlish wrote:

On Oct 11, 1:55*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

A gathering of Lows now fills the NE North Atlantic. The weather in
Britain is exactly as it was at the start of the spell I stated at the
outside, it would be so like. A dull overcast that requires one puts a
light on at mid day if one wishes to make a major repair to an engine,
or whatever, on one's kitchen table.

Dull? Overcast?? Are you sure???

You do know what these little sun symbols on these tables mean, W,
don't you?

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/...ons/index.html

I wonder if you could specify what neotype of androgen you conform to,
for me, please.

It's just that I have atypical homophobic attrition built into my
system and need to conform to whatever parameters I might be able to
reach for your edification.

No offence distended.

Abuse, as usual. I was questioning your understanding of "dull and
overcast" when applied to the UK and not just your own back garden.
Yesterday was not "dull and overcast" weather for the vast majority of
the UK. Therefore what you forecast was palpably wrong. As have been
your earthquake forecasts. 1 out of 8, 12.5% since mid-April is not
doing you many favours. If I hadn't monitored it, you might be able to
convince someone that your highly eccentric ramblings had a basis in
sense, but your outcome accuracy percentage shows anyone reading that
your theories are highly unlikely to have merit.

Although you'd like to ignore that, it surely concerns you?

On Oct 12, 8:41*am, Dawlish wrote:

Abuse, as usual. I was questioning your understanding of "dull and
overcast" when applied to the UK and not just your own back garden.

Now Dawlish my pet, I could never insult you. Take you to the vet's
perhaps and stop you humping lamp posts maybe but, ...insult you?

Impossible.

Have a biscuit, there's a good boy.

That once Icelandic Low is now three Lows up above Russia - which is
IIRC, what happened last time. One centre is just above Severnaya
Zemyla (I shall have to get used to that one) and somewhere between
Archangel and the Urals (that one was easy.)

We now await due process of physics -which if previous experience is
anything to go by will be about when the replacement lows take their
station in the Denmark Strait.

And since Norbert is well inland and coming down from 85 mph (which is
still a lot for an inland storm) and Odile is dead on the water, we
should have had a few remarkable earthquake pairs to look at. There
doesn't appear to be much showing. Perhaps an eruption at the Virgin
Islands?

Activity at the Soufriere Hills Volcano this week has been at a
slightly higher level consisting mainly of continued rockfalls and
mudflows. from the Montserrat Volcano Observatory Weekly Report for
the period 3rd to 10th October 2008.

So that's 2 days out already. Check back thereoffice hours eastern
seaboard time. The weather has improved enormously here so there was
definitely a major change last night.

On Oct 12, 9:15*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Oct 12, 8:41*am, Dawlish wrote:



Abuse, as usual. I was questioning your understanding of "dull and
overcast" when applied to the UK and not just your own back garden.

Now Dawlish my pet, I could never insult you. Take you to the vet's
perhaps and stop you humping lamp posts maybe but, ...insult you?

Impossible.

Have a biscuit, there's a good boy.

Any chance of answering the question about "dull and overcast"
yesterday, instead of continuing the abuse? You forecast "dull and
overcast" using your "spells" and it patently wasn't. Return to your
forecast and explain it. You are just prevaricating when your theory
doesn't work - as always.

Or continue to evade it and continue your abuse of the questioner?
(Which is far more probable)

seaboard time. The weather has improved enormously here so there was
definitely a major change last night.

And today with the weather looking fine the rest of the spell peters
out. 14th Oct with the spell set for 8 pm, the weather looks like it
is going to return to the first week of October. Which at 08:12 wasn't
that different to this: 20:03 was it?

Well, that's it for this one. (I think.)

In article
,
Dawlish wrote:

On Oct 12, 9:15*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Oct 12, 8:41*am, Dawlish wrote:



Abuse, as usual. I was questioning your understanding of "dull and
overcast" when applied to the UK and not just your own back garden.

Now Dawlish my pet, I could never insult you. Take you to the vet's
perhaps and stop you humping lamp posts maybe but, ...insult you?

Impossible.

Have a biscuit, there's a good boy.

Any chance of answering the question about "dull and overcast"
yesterday, instead of continuing the abuse? You forecast "dull and
overcast" using your "spells" and it patently wasn't. Return to your
forecast and explain it. You are just prevaricating when your theory
doesn't work - as always.

Or continue to evade it and continue your abuse of the questioner?
(Which is far more probable)

Its no use... he's lost in usenet self-dialogue.

Beware of his own reply's to his own posts... sometimes it leads to an
argument. LOL!!!

ROTFLMAO!


Coffee during 9/11