Eric Gisin was writhing in denials, because:

Bear_In_Mind was amused by the denialism expressed by:

Catatonic writhed in denials:

Of course corals are very adaptible and can handle change

Nope, wrong again..

http://environmentalism.suite101.com...to_save_corals

Sorry, environmentalism is religion

Sorry, denialism isn't a "sound science"..

Cut Back On CO2 to Save Corals
Lowering CO2 Emissions is Vital to Protect the World’s Coral Reefs

Cut Back On CO2 to Save Corals
Lowering CO2 Emissions is Vital to Protect the World’s Coral Reefs

If the world's levels of CO2 rise above 450 ppm,
it will destroy coral reef systems, a group of
Australian scientists warns, after experiments
simulating its effect.

The scientists led by Dr Ken Anthony of the ARC Centre
of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and Professor
Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, Director of the University of
Queensland’s Centre for Marine Studies, set up
experiments on Heron Island on the Great Barrier Reef
in Southeast Queensland, simulating the effects of
human-caused CO2 emissions and the resultant warming
and acidity of the waters around the reef.

The experiments measured the combined effects of warming,
high CO2 and sunlight on reef organisms placed in large
aquariums for two to six months.
...
“It is important to realise that exceeding 450ppm CO2 in the
atmosphere will remove tropical rainforests like the Daintree,
Amazon and Monte Verde,” he warned.

Unbelievable

For you, in your ambitious ignorance..

But, that's "denialism" at it's best..

There were far more rainforests 40M years ago

Prove it, don't expect me to take your 'say-so' for a fact..

“It will also destroy major wetland habitats such as Kakadu,
alpine ecosystems and a whole series of other natural ecosystems.

“With these things on the cards, life on planet Earth for
humans could become untenable.

Hysterical. This guy is ****ing insane.

Nope, that would again be yourself, projecting your self-centered
sociopathy of contentious ignorance..

We don't need rain forests and alpine areas

Prove it, show us something that substantiates your blather,
instead of simply editing out the parts you don't understand..

"Any government that is contemplating emission levels that would
result in anything more than about 450 ppm, is flirting with the
earth's future.” Good Management Key to Rescuing Reefs
--
“Marine pollution from chemicals and rubbish such as plastic bags play
havoc with marine organisms and ecosystems all over the world.

There is no global marine pollution

Liar..

Plastic bags have no effects, they are too rare.

You're still underestimating intentionally..

--See subject header for details..